The volume opens not with narrative but with the formal architecture of prosecution: the London Agreement, the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, and the full Indictment listing 24 defendants and six criminal organizations. These documents establish the legal framework and define terms like “conspiracy” and “aggression” that govern all subsequent evidence. A reader encountering this material first gains a precise understanding of the charges before any factual exhibits appear.

Following the Indictment, the editors include motions and rulings on individual defendants—Ley’s suicide, Krupp’s unfitness, Hess’s competence—which immediately show that the Tribunal’s process was contested and adaptive. This section signals that the volume is not a static record but a curated selection shaped by legal strategy and procedural decisions.

The Indictment as a Structural Blueprint

The Indictment (Chapter III) serves as the volume’s backbone. Its four counts—Common Plan or Conspiracy, Crimes against Peace, War Crimes, and Crimes against Humanity—are the categories into which all later documents are sorted. The list of defendants and organizations, with Appendix B defining each group, gives the reader a reference point for every affidavit or exhibit that follows. For instance, when Gottlob Berger’s affidavit describes the Henlein Free Corps, the reader can immediately connect it to the “Leadership Corps of the Nazi Party” or “SS” as defined in the Indictment. This structural clarity is the volume’s chief pedagogical device: it trains the reader to classify evidence by legal charge rather than chronology.

Opening Address as Interpretive Lens

The Opening Address for the United States (Chapter V) is the closest the volume comes to a prosecutorial narrative. It summarizes the conspiracy’s alleged stages: seizure of power, consolidation, rearmament, aggression, and atrocities. This speech provides a storyline that the documentary sections (Chapters VI–VII) then substantiate with exhibits. A first-time reader benefits from reading the address before diving into the organizational charts and affidavits, because it explains why certain documents—like the Henlein Free Corps affidavits—matter. The address also introduces key terms (“totalitarian political control,” “purge of political opponents”) that recur in the section headings, creating a consistent vocabulary across the volume.

Affidavits as Ground-Level Evidence

The later excerpts include sworn statements from participants like Gottlob Berger and Alfred Naujocks. These affidavits offer concrete, often mundane details—rifle types, liaison officers, teleprinter links—that anchor the abstract conspiracy charges in observable acts. Berger’s account of the Henlein Free Corps, for example, specifies that it was “armed with Manlicher-Schoenauer rifles from Army depots in Austria” and that about 18,000 rifles were issued. Such precision is typical of the volume’s documentary method: it prioritizes verifiable fact over interpretation. The reader should note that these affidavits are not neutral; they were selected by the prosecution and often given by defendants or accomplices. The volume does not include cross-examinations or defense exhibits, so the reader must weigh the source and context of each statement.

Organizational Charts and the Bureaucracy of Atrocity

Chapter VI, “Organization of the Nazi Party and State,” presents charts and descriptions of the Nazi hierarchy. This section is essential for understanding the chain of command that later affidavits assume. For instance, Naujocks’s reference to “Amt III of the SD” and its teleprinter link to Berlin only makes sense if the reader has grasped the SD’s place within Himmler’s SS empire. The volume’s editors clearly intended these organizational materials to function as a map: without them, the reader would struggle to connect individual actors to the larger conspiracy. A first reading should treat Chapter VI as a reference to be revisited whenever a document mentions a specific office or unit.

This volume is best approached as a lawyer’s brief rather than a history book. Its arrangement—from legal framework to opening argument to documentary proof—mirrors the prosecution’s case at Nuremberg. Readers who start with the Indictment and Opening Address will find the later affidavits and exhibits easier to situate. The volume does not tell a continuous story; it assembles evidence for a verdict. Treat each document as a piece of a mosaic, and use the organizational charts as your guide to the picture’s overall design.